Saturday, July 01, 2006

If you are in or near the Battle Creek, MI area and have an interest in firearms use and training be sure to visit the Southside Sportsman Club. They have an indoor range, CCW (CPL) training classes and much more. For more information visit their web site here.


Posted by Buck
posted on 7/1/2006 3:11:12 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Titled: Michigan's Castle Doctrine package heading to Governor's desk!

Michigan's Castle Doctrine package heading to Governor's desk!

Earlier this week, Michigan's Castle Doctrine package of House and Senate Bills was overwhelmingly passed by our State Legislators and are now en route to Governor Granholm's desk.

This package will help the citizens of Michigan by clarifying the rights and duties of self-defense and the defense of others while at home, in your vehicle, or anywhere you have a right to be. It will also provide immunity from civil liability for self-defense actions.

Given that Dick DeVos is on record as supporting this package, Granholm is expected to sign it, however, we encourage you to call Governor Granholm and urge her to support this vital piece of legislation!


Posted by Buck
posted on 7/1/2006 1:25:58 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

I ran accross this Michigan Gun owners forum recently and thought I would pass it along. Its called the MGO Community Forum and can be found here.


Posted by Buck
posted on 7/1/2006 1:19:41 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Various House and Senate substitutes/amendments to Michigan's Castle Doctrine package were voted on and passed today. Each House Bill was given immediate effect; bills ordered enrolled for printing and presentation to the Governor.

HB 5143 Self-defense and defense of others.
HB 5142 Criminal forcibly entering or intruding into home or vehicle.
HB 5153 Flight requirement; eliminate.
HB 5548 Civil action against person who uses force in self-defense act.
SB 1046 Passed in the House and returned to Senate.
SB 1185 Passed in the House and returned to Senate.

Source: Michigan Castle Doctrine Update!


Posted by Buck
posted on 6/27/2006 8:53:54 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Organizing the hijacking of the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon took significant sums of money. The cost of these plots suggests that putting Osama bin Laden and other international terrorists out of business will require more than diplomatic coalitions and military action. Washington and its allies must also disable the financial networks used by terrorists. The Bush administration is preparing new laws to help track terrorists through their money-laundering activity and is readying an executive order freezing the assets of known terrorists. Much more is needed, including stricter regulations, the recruitment of specialized investigators and greater cooperation with foreign banking authorities.

There must also must be closer coordination among America´s law enforcement, national security and financial regulatory agencies. Osama bin Laden originally rose to prominence because his inherited fortune allowed him to bankroll Arab volunteers fighting Soviet forces in Afghanistan. Since then, he has acquired funds from a panoply of Islamic charities and illegal and legal businesses, including export-import and commodity trading firms, and is estimated to have as much as $300 million at his disposal.Some of these businesses move funds through major commercial banks that lack the procedures to monitor such transactions properly. Locally, terrorists can utilize tiny unregulated storefront financial centers, including what are known as hawala banks, which people in South Asian immigrant communities in the United States and other Western countries use to transfer money abroad. Though some smaller financial transactions are likely to slip through undetected even after new rules are in place, much of the financing needed for major attacks could dry up.

Washington should revive international efforts begun during the Clinton administration to pressure countries with dangerously loose banking regulations to adopt and enforce stricter rules. These need to be accompanied by strong sanctions against doing business with financial institutions based in these nations. The Bush administration initially opposed such measures. But after the events of Sept. 11, it appears ready to embrace them. The Treasury Department also needs new domestic legal weapons to crack down on money laundering by terrorists. The new laws should mandate the identification of all account owners, prohibit transactions with "shell banks" that have no physical premises and require closer monitoring of accounts coming from countries with lax banking laws. Prosecutors, meanwhile, should be able to freeze more easily the assets of suspected terrorists.

The Senate Banking Committee plans to hold hearings this week on a bill providing for such measures. It should be approved and signed into law by President Bush. New regulations requiring money service businesses like the hawala banks to register and imposing criminal penalties on those that do not are scheduled to come into force late next year. The effective date should be moved up to this fall, and rules should be strictly enforced the moment they take effect. If America is going to wage a new kind of war against terrorism, it must act on all fronts, including the financial one.

The New York Times, September 24, 2001

Hat-tip to Free Republic


Posted by dave
posted on 6/27/2006 12:11:24 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Titled:   Early human bird flu death uncovered in China

A man died of H5N1 flu in Beijing in November 2003 - two full years before China admitted any human cases of H5N1. The death of the 24-year-old from bird flu came months before China even admitted H5N1 was circulating in its poultry.

Reminds me of a similar approach to the SARS outbreaks:

"THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT has not covered up. There is no need," Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said last Tuesday in regard to the country's outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). "We have nothing to hide," assured Jianchao. But shortly afterwards, CNN's satellite feed to a Beijing block of expatriate apartments was cut off during a report on the disease.

What China claimed it was not covering up is a much higher incidence of SARS--a virus causing high fever, shortness of breath, and an estimated 4 percent death rate--than it had previously admitted. Two days after Jianchao's statement, Chinese authorities made a rapid about-face, revising numbers upward and admitting cases in provinces where they had previously denied any incidence of the disease. They also increased their cooperation with the World Health Organization, to which China belongs. As a result, a WHO team has finally been allowed access to Guangdong, where the disease apparently started.

Chinese President Hu Jintao travelled to the United States in April, largely to build trust:

"China believes mutual trust is lacking and that is at the root of tensions between the two countries, be it trade, military spending or human rights," said Tsinghua University analyst He Maochun.

I wonder why that mutual trust is lacking?


Posted by dave
posted on 6/27/2006 10:12:17 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, June 22, 2006

No, not from Iraq. John "I have the hat" Kerry's resolution to cut-and-run from Iraq was soundly defeated 86-13. He did however characterize it as a great victory:

Feingold and Kerry declared the vote a victory, since their bid last week to mandate a pullout by December 31 got six votes.

"It was terrific," Kerry said. "Several votes more than we anticipated."

Which is like Germany claiming it won the Second World War because it involved more people that their first attempt.

The withdrawal mentioned in the title is instead from Germany itself, the US having lost a pitched battle against superpower Ghana in the World Cup.

Yes - Ghana! Noted mainly for colorful cloth:

Perhaps the most visible (and most marketable) cultural contribution from modern Ghana is Kente cloth, which is widely recognized and valued for its colors and symbolism.

And now known for keeping #5 ranked USA out of the World Cup finals.


Posted by dave
posted on 6/22/2006 4:37:21 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Titled:   Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq

The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday.

"We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."

So two possibilities exist: That there are none at all, and this is just a big whopper from the evil empire, or that they do actually exist and the basis for all the arguements from the left is reduced to a smoking wreck.

In the case of the latter, I find it particularly interesting that the left have been allowed to continue for so long, building their case on an erroneous assumption, only to have it collapsed just prior to the November elections.

Maybe the morons in power are indeed a clever bunch after all?


Posted by dave
posted on 6/22/2006 9:37:05 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 13, 2006

I would like to expand the Blogging pool here at Liberty1st so if you are a conservative / libertarian wanting to get a start in Blogging email me at "blog at liberty1st.org". Since Dave and I are both from the Great Lakes area it would be nice to keep a theme going but not necessary. Just let me know what part of the country you are from.

All that is necessary is a libertarian perspective with a Conservative / Right of Center slant. However, there is no political line you have to toe or political party you have to support. Any politician or act from a politician that infringes on liberty is fair game.

And my rules are very simple:

1. No making or spreading wild conspiracy theories.
2. No personal attacks on anyone ever.
3. Be prepared to back up everything you say.
4. Keep it clean.
5. 90% or more of the content should focus on Liberty, Freedom, Politics, etc.

So if you like what Dave and I do here and are interested in contributing just send and email to "blog at liberty1st.org"


Posted by Buck
posted on 6/13/2006 10:01:04 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, June 08, 2006

More self defense goodness from the 2006 Michigan Congress.

First there is Senate Bill 1185, which bans lawsuits in cases of legitimate self defense and then on the CPL side of Self Defense there is House Bill 5217, which makes CPL applicant information confidential.

It seems as though the Michigan congress is on the verge of recognizing the People's absolute right to self defense. I wonder if Governor Grandholm will agree?


Posted by Buck
posted on 6/8/2006 7:29:08 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Titled:   UK TIMES SMEARS OUR MARINES (UPDATED WITH RESPONSE)

Michelle Malkin is doing a good job keeping on top of the latest press outrage.

Posted on June 1st in the UK Times:

Posted in the same paper, April 2005:

Yup, same picture - different story.

Using pictures of a terrorist execution to smear the Marines.

Shameless.


Posted by Dave
posted on 6/8/2006 10:52:28 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Titled:   For Heart Health, Liquor Is Quicker for Women and Slower for Men

An alcoholic drink a day can significantly reduce the risk for heart disease in men, a new study finds, but women get almost the same benefit with only one drink a week.

For men, the more they drank, the lower the risk. One drink a week lowered the risk by about 7 percent, two to four drinks by 22 percent and five or six drinks a week by 29 percent. Those who drank every day had a 41 percent lower risk of heart disease than those who did not drink at all. Even among men who had up to 35 drinks per week, the protection persisted.

With women, the trend was different. One drink a week lowered the risk by 36 percent, but daily drinking lowered it by 35 percent. In other words, for women, alcohol consumption had a significant protective effect, but the frequency of drinking had none.

Dr. Morten Gronbaek of the Danish National Institute of Public Health, the study's senior author, said he would not hesitate to recommend a drink a day to certain patients. "If I were talking to a patient, about 50 with a high coronary risk profile, who I knew wasn't at risk for alcohol abuse, and who didn't drink at all, I wouldn't hesitate to tell him that a glass of wine a day might be a good idea," he said. "But people who are light drinkers should certainly not be advised to drink more."

There is a caveat though:

"You shouldn't avoid exercise," he said, "and then try to compensate by drinking."

Apparently drinking is not exercise for more than your right arm...

Cheers!


Posted by dave
posted on 6/8/2006 10:29:06 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Michigan's repeal of the Duty to Retreat is making its way though congress.

Senate Bill 1046

Introduced by Sen. Alan L. Cropsey on February 15, 2006, to create a new law establishing that a person who uses deadly force for self defense in his or her home, contiguous private property or occupied vehicle need not first flee from a threatening attacker, and that a person who unlawfully and forcibly enters one of these is presumed is to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence, with certain minor exceptions. This would place the “home is my castle” doctrine in statute. Also, to establish that a law-abiding person who is attacked in a place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat, and can “stand his or her ground” and meet force with force, including deadly force if necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm.

Text and Analysis here.

House Bill 5142

Introduced by Rep. Tom Casperson on September 7, 2005, to establish in law that a person who uses deadly force for self defense in his or her home or contiguous private property need not first flee from a threatening attacker.

Text and Analysis here.


Posted by Buck
posted on 6/7/2006 7:33:51 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 06, 2006

In an article a few months back, I wrote about colored guns.

I would imagine enterprising bank robbers will soon be sporting orange-tipped weapons to give them a few seconds edge on the police and concealed license holders. If they're willing to rob a bank armed, what makes you think they won't apply some orange paint?
Well, it seems that New York's Mayor Bloomberg must have been reading. He unveiled new legislation yesterday taking direct aim at "coloration kits" that can make guns look like toys. So now not only are black rifles like the AR-15 "evil" in the gun-grabbers' eyes, but now guns of color are too. So far, no-one seems to have noticed that most SKS and AK-47 types come in wooden stocks. I guess it is only a matter of time that wood is "evil" too, what with its extra design feature of making the rifle a very effective club, somrthing that the composite firearms generally suck at.
"Just think about how sick it is," Bloomberg said. "What possible reason can you give to want to paint a gun so it looks like a child's toy gun, other than to put a police officer in one of those impossible positions?"
Er... because I like unique firearms? Because I can? Because it negates the "black is evil" argument that our rabid opponents like to spout?

Walmart includes this beginner's rifle in their catalog:




An the AR15 can sport a wide range of colors, before we even look at paint:




The NYT has another and final snippet:
Although no painted guns have been recovered in connection with crimes, Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said, the proposed law is a pre-emptive move, intended to stop criminals from potentially tricking police officers with candy-colored weapons.
You can have it when you prise it from my cold, dead, paint-stained fingers...


Posted by dave
posted on 6/6/2006 10:23:32 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Titled: Gun buybacks make return to Boston

Boston officials said yesterday they have raised approximately $40,000 to resume a gun buyback program, which will offer $200 Target gift cards for each working gun that is turned in.

"We want guns that are on the street causing the violence and maiming and hurting and killing people."

Old guns, particularly dangerous ones, are now worth $200 in Boston, no questions asked...

That should attract a fair few into the area and provide much needed funds for the purchase of newer, more effective models.



Posted by dave
posted on 5/31/2006 10:24:04 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, May 29, 2006

I am honored and humbled by the hard work, dedication and sacrifice of those that have fought and died for this great country. Thank You.

Also may God bless those who have served or are currently serving as well as their families, who have sacrificed more then I can ever imagine. Thank you all.


Posted by Buck
posted on 5/29/2006 10:23:01 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Titled:    Smart gun' shows promise - and promises controversy

As police in Philadelphia struggle to stop a scourge of shootings, some New Jersey engineers say they are closing in on a "smart" solution: a gun that can be fired only by its owner.

The prototype, developed at the New Jersey Institute of Technology in Newark, has pressure sensors embedded in the gun handle that recognize a person's unique grip.

The team says a commercial model is up to five years away, but if it works, it will trigger a singular - and controversial - state law. Within three years, all handguns sold in New Jersey would have to be personalized, with this or some other recognition technology.

...

Various smart-gun efforts have flamed out in the past, amid vocal skepticism by the National Rifle Association. Many gun owners chafe at the notion of any restrictions on their Second Amendment right to bear arms, and warn that any such modifications would make guns more expensive.

Gun-control advocates, meanwhile, are split, with some warning that personalized firearms would give owners a false sense of security.

...

Once the shooter squeezes the trigger, the grip sensors spring into action, recording the pressure for one-tenth of a second. In that moment, the pressure applied by each finger varies enough that engineers can distinguish between shooters with a high degree of reliability. A grip's signature does not vary significantly from firing to firing, even in stressful situations, researchers have found.

A year and a half ago, a prototype recognized authorized users nine out of 10 times. Now, the rate lies between 95 and 99 percent, said Michael Cody, a computer science engineer on the team.

So 5% percent of the time the gun fails to recognize you and fails to shoot? An attorney's dream and a citizen's nightmare.
Maybe the police would be happy to test it out for a few years first?

At the very least, the technology would cut down on violence committed with the 500,000 handguns that are stolen each year, said Stephen Teret, public health professor at Johns Hopkins University. "If all those guns had been personalized guns," Teret said, "they would be useless when they were stolen."

500,000? Even the gun-grabbing Americans for Gun Safety Foundation boasts a count of 170,000 and that is for all firearms, let alone pistols.
With that much home invasion going on, it just proves the ineffectiveness of the police to protect people in their homes and the need for self defense tools such as pistols in the first place.

Remember, Philadelphia is the city trying to crack down on concealed carry. Alphecca had a good round up a couple of months back:
What the news article doesn't mention is that most of this violence is the result of street gangs, drug gangs, et al. Frankly, I wouldn't worry about the 28,000 legally licensed citizens concealed-carrying. I'd be more concerned about the thousands of criminals who haven't bothered (and never will) obtaining a permit. They're the ones commiting mayhem. Bust-up the mutant gangs, throw them in jail, and watch the violence decrease. Don't start leaving the haplass honest folk defenseless.

Keep it simple - Keep it safe.

Posted by dave
posted on 5/29/2006 2:36:59 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #