January 13, 2006
@ 04:20 PM

Titled:    Why gun bans don't work … and what to do

James A. Swann discusses why gun bans often have the opposite effect and what to do about it. A good read, but for me, the most interesting part comes at the end:

At the upcoming Safari Club convention in Reno, Nev., I'll be chairing a panel of folks from Hollywood who shoot and hunt and want to do something about the negative media spin on hunters and guns. They will have proposals for movies, TV series, contests, promotional ventures and more.

If you can't get to Reno, stay tuned, and in February I'll tell you what kind of media magic the pros want to conjure up to ban the bans.

Anything pro-gun from Hollywood would be welcome.


 
Categories: Firearms | Misc

Titled:    Councilor: Make handguns with GPS tracking chip

Via Wizbang comes a story of a crazy gun-grabbing councilor, so bent on gun control that he wants gun manufacturers to include GPS tracking devices in every new firearm. Mentioning Boston’s adoption of GPS-enabled school buses and snowplows as an example, his call ignores the reality of criminally-held firearms. Apart from almost doubling the weight, I can't imagine an entirely tamper-proof GPS system surviving for more than a few minutes. Even leaving it sitting around for a few days until the batteries are flat would work around that one.

The original story from the Boston Herald quotes:

The city councilor picked Smith & Wesson because it’s a Massachusetts-based company. “I’m calling on them to step up to the plate,” he said. The company has yet to respond.

Sure, if they want to lose a large portion of their customers. The police add to the rosy picture:

As for the GPS idea, police said they “support any type of gun control.”

Wouldn't it be cheaper just to force manufacturers to paint each firearm pink, and have it play "Kumbaya" over and over?


 
Categories: Bill of Rights | Firearms | Technology

January 12, 2006
@ 01:55 PM

Titled:   Have you a licence for that opinion, sir?

Samizdata brings us news of what happens in a society that places no value on free speech:

The clampdown on disrespect continues. Sir Iqbal Sacranie is under police investigation. The putative crime, a public order offence, disorderly conduct: behaviour likely to cause alarm, harrassment or distress contrary to the Public Order Act 1986.

So, has Sir Iqbal been staggering aggressively around a shopping centre waving his fist at passers-by? Has he been picketing a building yelling threats at workers? Has he been hanging around on a street corner with his legal director and PR man, holding open bottles of cheap cider and throwing traffic cones at one another?

No. Sir Iqbal is a genial, if quite intense, man. He's been doing the sort of thing he got knighted for.

The alleged offense took place in the course of a serious discussion of his religious beliefs on Radio 4. He reportedly said that homosexual behaviour is not acceptable on moral or health grounds, and that civil partnerships therefore were not acceptable either. Some people were offended by this "homophobia" and complained to the police.

Under these rules, you could probably arrest anyone you wanted. They seem to be speeding up the process too: another Muslim, Mr Abu Hamster Hamza, incited hate for nearly a decade before they decided to do anything about him.


 
Categories:

January 11, 2006
@ 09:49 PM

Titled: Mouse Thrown Into Fire Sets Home Ablaze



 

This story caught my eye as it ran its way around the blogosphere. In case you didn't catch it, a mouse got instant revenge against a homeowner who tried to dispose of it in a pile of burning leaves. The blazing creature ran back to the man's house and burnt it down.

In all the versions I found so far, no-one seems to question the actions of the homeowner for disposing of a live mouse on a burning leaf-pile. Before you think I'm a member of People Eating Tasty Animals PETA, I have nothing against the destruction of pests in a reasonably humane manner and am an active advocate of hunting. Why he didn't just whap it with a shovel rather than set it on fire, I'll probably never know.

Methods aside, the little critter did a great job reducing the guy's home to ashes.

 
Categories: Misc

January 11, 2006
@ 08:37 PM

Titled:    From North of the Border

mAssBackwards brings us good news from the state of New Hampshire:

House Bill 1639-FN, prohibits the confiscation of lawfully owned and lawfully carried firearms during a state of emergency, making a felon of any law enforcement officer who attempts to seize such a firearm during a disaster.

After the Katrina debacle, someone with common sense has realized that having firearms in the hands of law-abiding citizens during an emergency can be a useful thing.

If only we can now get that introduced in every state.
 
Categories: Bill of Rights | Firearms | Law and Order

January 10, 2006
@ 12:28 PM

Titled: Assembly Bills Target Gun Violence

New York gives notice that it intends to commit suicide deepen its problems in this article outlining new proposed gun ban control laws.

Cracking Down on Illegal Street Gun Trafficking
The bill, sponsored by Assemblywoman Amy Paulin (D-Scarsdale), requires stringent recordkeeping and reporting to prevent gun sales to criminals. Additionally, under terms of the legislation, gun dealers must implement a security plan, require employee training and prohibit minor's access to guns.

Besides the fact that selling guns to criminals is already a crime, records are already kept and the FBI is consulted on every dealer sale, this is just futher harassment of dealers and owners. I can't imagine a gun dealer that doesn't already have a security plan, training and access policies. 

Banning Armor Piercing Ammunition
This measure, sponsored by Assemblyman David Koon seeks to rid New York streets of deadly armor piercing ammunition and ammunition that is designed to fragment or explode upon impact.

Most rifle ammunition pierces the type of armor issued to the police. Fragmenting ammunition is a safety feature designed to avoid pass-through injuries to bystanders and explosive ammunition is already strictly regulated.

Tracking Guns Involved In Crimes
Another bill included in the package would require law enforcement personnel to submit ballistic information to the new State Police Ballistic Identification Databank whenever spent bullets, shell casings or guns come into their possession.

And what a success all the other databases have been! Even country wide systems like Canada has have been huge, expensive failures, reducing funding for more traditional and effective policing.

Keeping Guns Out of the Hands of Violent Felons
Another bill would eliminate a loophole that allows a convicted violent felon to obtain a firearms license and possess a gun after being granted a legal waiver.

This should be a question for the issuer of the waivers, who should set fair policy, not a blanket law that allows no exceptions.

The Children's Weapon Accident Prevention Act
This legislation, sponsored by Assemblyman Harvey Weisenberg (D-Long Beach), seeks to protect children from accidental shootings. Five new categories of crime would be created under the bill's provisions for negligent storage of a weapon.

Lock 'em up, unloaded, with the ammo stored elsewhere to avoid fines and jail time. Making self-defense weapons all but useless. Nothing like trying to unlock a gun, find the ammo, load and aim while someone is threatening you and your family.

Childproofing Firearms
This bill, sponsored by Assemblyman Steve Englebright (D-East Setauket), would seek to reduce child-related shootings, particularly those tragedies of children shooting children. This bill would make it a Class A misdemeanor to sell guns without childproof features. Covered under provisions of the bill are pistols or revolvers manufactured 12 or more months after the effective date of the bill. Design features could include making the weapon more difficult to fire by adjusting the trigger resistance of the gun to at least a 10-pound pull, altering the firing mechanism so that an average five-year-old child's hand would be too small to operate the gun or to require a series of multiple motions in order to fire the gun.

10 pound trigger pulls make for lousy handguns, increasing the risk of badly-aimed shooting. This law is aiming to make guns more expensive, more difficult to use under stress and is a roundabout way of forcing manufacturers to make firearms just for New York or lose the right to sell there. With over 200 million firearms in circulation already in the US this is just another step onto the slippery slope of a total national ban.

Stopping Assault Weapons
This legislation, sponsored by Assemblyman John Lavelle (D-Staten Island), would ban assault weapons. Seeking to address the void when President Bush and Congress allowed the federal assault weapon ban to expire, the Assembly proposal would expand the definition of assault weapon to prohibit more of these deadly guns in New York - including guns that have been modified to work like assault weapons.

Under the gun-grabbers definition of "assault weapons", this would cover just about any semi-automatic firearm.

Banning 50-Caliber Weapons
Another proposal, sponsored by Assemblywoman Patricia Eddington (D-Patchogue), would ban 50-caliber sniper weapons, which can be used to disable commercial aircraft and helicopters and are powerful enough to penetrate steel plating.

Another law attempting to follow The Peoples Republic of California. Our right is to have military grade weapons, not sporting arms. The 2nd is NOT about hunting. 

Domestic Violence
Sponsored by Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell (D-Manhattan), this measure seeks to protect victims of domestic violence by requiring criminal or family court judges to inquire about the existence and location of firearms owned or possessed by a defendant when an order of protection is sought.

Pick a crazy partner who thinks a piece of paper is going to protect them and your rights are gone forever. Not only will the court take away these rights, it will now be forced in enquire about the locations of all weapons in your possession. 

 

Oh, how deluded these lawmakers prove themselves to be over and over again. I know I'm undoubtably preaching to the choir here, but laws do not affect criminals. That is why they are called criminals. Laws only affect victims, making more of them and making their right to a peaceful and safe life more difficult.

One argument is to allow the states to pass whatever they want and then see where the people move to as the cities decay into chaos. Unfortunately while we can use information to choose a place to live, once you are there, it is a significant burden to uproot and escape the madness. Once one state starts to impinge on our rights, the others often follow. 

Please do whatever you can to stop the madness now, before it is too late.


 
Categories: Bill of Rights | Firearms | Law and Order

January 9, 2006
@ 04:53 PM

Titled:   Sen. Kennedy to Publish Children's Book

The rolling train wreck of comedy that is Swimmer Senator Kennedy continues his journey into the annals of comedic irony this week with the launch of his new childrens book "My Senator and Me: A Dogs-Eye View of Washington, D.C."

And what do we learn from Ol' Flipper this time? That he has a dog named "Splash".

This is the same Senator quoted in the aftemath of hurricane Katrina:

"What the American people have seen is this incredible disparity in which those people who had cars and money got out and those people who were impoverished died."

Does he actually know what he is doing?


 
Categories: Misc | Politics

January 9, 2006
@ 11:43 AM

Titled:   The End of Blogs?

Say Uncle reports on what may be the end of blogs as we know it. Aparently on January 5th 2006 H.R. 3402, the “Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005″ outlawed any anonymous comment on a blog that "annoys" another party.

According to CNET News.com:

Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."

Because the penalty is up to two years, that is enough to ensure you would lose your Second Ammendment rights too.

The word "annoys" is clearly a problem too, being so vague and not specifying even a reasonable level of actual harm and distress.

It looks as if the Right to not be Annoyed has trumped at least the First and Second Ammendments.


 
January 9, 2006
@ 11:14 AM

Titled:   No ID card? Hand over £2,500 then!

Samizdata highlights the slippery slope of liberty infringement in the UK. First there is floated the idea of a voluntary card for security purposes, with public consultation. Then despite an overwhelming outcry, the project gets moved ahead anyway, with assurances that no-one will be forced to have one. Then the cost comes in: about $150 per card. Which will now be required if you want Government "Services". Then local government is given sweeping new powers to heavily fine people if they don't have one when their homes are searched. Full story here.


 
Categories: Bill of Rights

January 9, 2006
@ 09:22 AM

Titled: N.Y. Times Editor-Reporter Dies After Attack in NW

It is often said a liberal is a conservative who hasn't been mugged yet. Often, this violent and unexpected shock is enough for people to open their minds a little and consider options previously considered out-of-bounds. In the above story, David E. Rosenbaum was killed and robbed near his home in Washington D.C., a city with a blanket gun ban in place, despite constitutional protections. And the local people's reaction?

"We have very small children. We'll have our guard up even more, use our alarms more religiously," Bass said.

Yup - that will do it. Just like those appalling ADT commercials on TV, where the guy in black breaks open the back door, the alarm sounds and the family huddles hopelessly together awaiting the call from the montoring center. "Are you OK? Help is on its way." I'd just like them to show what happens in the intervening 15 minutes. Or an alternative version, where the family replies "Yes we're fine, but we need someone to come take the body away."

So citizens of D.C., set your alarms. Especially the ones you use when walking around in that oh-so-safe city of yours?


 
Categories: Firearms | Law and Order