Friday, August 19, 2005

Titled: New CCW law hasn't resulted in 'Wild West'

There have been no shootouts at local fast-food restaurants following disputes over who was in line first, nor has there been vigilante justice carried out by armed citizens since a signficant change in the state's approach to issuing concealed weapons permits four years ago.

The Dodge City, OK Corral, and Wild West-style gun fights in the street predicted by those opposed to a change in the concealed weapons law have failed to materialize. The naysayers who voiced opposition to the new law, which opened the door for more individuals to carry a concealed weapon (CCW) have been silenced — not literally, but figuratively.

I don't think anybody worth taking seriously ever really believed that Michigan or any other "Shall Issue" state was going to turn into the wild west. It was nothing more then fear mongering.

It seems concerns about simple disputes being solved by gun battles in the streets were overblown. Even Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard says concerns over the CCW reforms — and the potential for gun violence — was more hype than reality.

"I don't think there have been many problems at all," Bouchard said. "We are one of the largest issuing counties in the state in terms of raw (CCW permit) numbers. Typically, what you find is that people that are law-abiding individuals are the ones that are going to go through the process to be licensed to carry (a concealed weapon)."

Well duh. By definition a non-law abiding citizens are not abiding by the laws anyway. A prohibition to carry a weapon would mean nothing to them.

Bouchard admits that the uproar over the new CCW law was blown out of proportion. The fear that traffic altercations would end up in gun battles never materialized.

"There was a lot of misconception about what would go on," he said.

Most local law enforcement officials agree.

West Bloomfield Police Lt. Carl Fuhs said he's not aware of any problems related individuals with CCW permits within the township.

"(There have been) none," Fuhs said.

How can anyone be surprised that people who generally obey the laws are in fact generally obeying the laws and not using their guns to settle arguments.

I am sure there have already been CPL holders who have used their guns wrongly (and lost the right to carry) but obviously they are the exception and not the rule. You just can't argue with reality. Well that is unless you are a part of the Brady campaign and then you not only argue with reality you twist it to fit your narrow view of the people's right or non-right, as the case would be, for self protection.

This is a great article detailing the post "Shall Issue" condition of Michigan. I wish there were more like it from main stream media outlets but that just aint gonna happen. Not in my lifetime anyway.

Oh yea there is this also

Jones has also introduced legislation that would allow permit holders carry a concealed weapon registered to their spouse. That bill, House Bill 4642, was introduced earlier this year and sent to the House Conversation, Forestry, and Outdoor Recreation Committee.

"Rather than make a husband and wife buy another gun, we let the CCW holder carry their spouse's," Jones said. "This is just plain common sense that makes the CCW permit more user-friendly to the good, law-abiding residents of Michigan."

It does make good sence. I am really excited by this one and hope that it does make it into law.

Posted by Buck
posted on 8/19/2005 7:40:38 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Related Posts:
Some things need to be said
Detroit Police
Trawling for Email
Yes - It's Done
U.N. Gives In - Again
Momentum