Monday, August 14, 2006
Titled:   Straight shooting for better gun laws

James Alan Fox of the Boston Herald must be bored:

What is so wrong with ballistic fingerprinting Sure, I’ve heard the argument that gun barrels can be replaced or modified. As a parallel to actual fingerprinting, criminals sometimes wear gloves or alter their fingertips, but that doesn’t discourage us from collecting this kind of forensic evidence.

The ATF tracing initiative has consistently shown that less than 1 percent of gun dealers are linked to a majority of firearms recovered from criminal enterprises. While most of these traces may have involved legitimate transactions, ATF investigations have uncovered thousands of federal law violations by these dealers. Unfortunately, recent congressional legislation significantly limits public and law enforcement access to gun-tracing information, thereby shielding rogue dealers.

Aside from some paranoid view of government intrusion, what really is the danger of firearms registration or of background checks on all gun sales We register automobiles, and qualify and license drivers; why not do the same with guns and their owners It makes no sense to prevent law enforcement from tracking firearms transfers that fuel the illegal market. We could even install LoJack-style, GPS devices into new guns to curtail trade in stolen firearms.
It seems as if his performance objectives for the year include the number of email comments received, and he can only achieve this by trotting out the same old, tired suggestions to infringe our rights yet again.

If you feel like helping the poor guy make a "Meets Expectations" rating, you can write to
j.fox@neu.edu

Posted by dave
posted on 8/14/2006 12:56:45 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Related Posts:
Some things need to be said
"without lawful, proper, or sufficient purpose"
Microstamping
Detroit Police
Follow Up
No Hate in Seattle